Is A.I. the Death of Art? Or the Future of Creativity?

Some opponents of A.I. art are concerned that it would devalue the work of the professional artists . After all, like any commodity, of the value of art is derived from its supply and demand, and if the creation of art is made easy and accessible to everyone, the supply would grow exponentially, causing the market value of works of art to plummet. It is already hard for artists to make a living, and if A.I. art became widespread, the opponents believe, it would only become harder.
Controversy over new art-making technologies is nothing new. Many painters were extremely opposed to the invention of the camera, which they saw as a threat to human artistry. But the camera didn’t replace painters, it simply created a new medium for them to explore. And the same is true of A.I.-generated art.
While the initial iterations of image synth tools were limited to what artists could do tell them to do in one shot, these tools are rapidly being enhanced to increase creative control and enable working in iterations. These creative controls are restoring the the importance of the artist in the creative process.

Read more at: Is A.I. the Death of Art? Or the Future of Creativity?